$wpsc_version = 169; {"id":553,"date":"2012-03-23T19:49:52","date_gmt":"2012-03-23T19:49:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/christophergully.com\/?p=553"},"modified":"2013-04-05T19:52:12","modified_gmt":"2013-04-05T19:52:12","slug":"fuel-from-slime-suspension-of-disbelief","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/christophergully.com\/2012\/03\/fuel-from-slime-suspension-of-disbelief\/","title":{"rendered":"Fuel From Slime: Suspension of Disbelief"},"content":{"rendered":"

The science fiction genre, in literature and film, has always had a difficult time appealing to a mainstream audience. While much of that is to do with poor writing and a focus on technology rather than art, it is also due to something Samuel Coleridge called\u00a0suspension of disbelief<\/a>. This is achieved when the writer involves enough of a human element, and enough universal truth, that the fantastical becomes believable. When the artist fails to achieve suspension of disbelief, the audience can\u2019t take the fantasy seriously, and the narrative fails.<\/p>\n

Outside of the realm of fiction, alternative energy sources are suffering from a similar challenge. Convincing those who may not have a grasp on the science that we can generate energy from something unexpected requires not only that we present the evidence, but also that we appeal to their imagination. To quote science fiction author and futurist\u00a0Arthur C. Clarke<\/a>:<\/p>\n

Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

With this in mind, it comes as no surprise that the American public is generally\u00a0skeptical<\/a>\u00a0of efforts to create fuel out of algae. That thick, slimy, green pond scum that made many of us afraid to dip our toes in the lake, is a potentially game-changing source of energy. Soon after US President Obama promoted algae as an alternative energy source at a speech in Miami last month, the Republic presidential nominees launched a series of retaliatory strikes on \u201cPresident Algae<\/a>\u201d arguing that his claims of algae as a fuel source were, effectively, science fiction.<\/p>\n

But if we can ignore the politics of the issue for now, and focus on the science, then it\u2019s clean that this is not as much of a ridiculous idea as some would argue. While the technology remains in its infancy, algae\u00a0has the potential<\/a>\u00a0to produce ten times more energy per hectare than traditional biofuel crops such as corn or soybeans. Further, the land used for algae production can be arid, brackish, or otherwise unfit for agriculture, ensuring that any land lost to algae production doesn\u2019t impact food supply. As with all biofuels, the carbon that\u2019s released when it\u2019s burned is offset by the carbon that it absorbs as it\u2019s grown. Combined with energy-efficient transportation and infrastructure, algae biofuel could make up part of a varied and balanced low-carbon energy system.<\/p>\n

\"The<\/a>
The algae biofuel cycle<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Algae really is an\u00a0amazing little plant<\/a>. It has been used for centuries as a fertilizer, it\u2019s edible and nutritious, has been made into biodegradable plastics, and has also been used as a natural pigment. Up to forty percent of the oxygen you\u2019re breathing at this moment was produced by algae floating in our oceans. On top of this, it grows quickly, so harvest times are significantly shorter than traditional biofuel crops. If it\u2019s so easy to grow and harvest, what\u2019s holding us back?<\/p>\n

The risks to algae-fuel production are real, especially when dealing with bio-engineered strains. Such algae, if it escaped into the natural environment, could run the risk of seriously disrupting and damaging the natural environment, though some scientists argue\u00a0this risk is minimal<\/a>\u00a0as such strains would be uncompetitive against natural algae.<\/p>\n

It also has a long way to go economically. Prohibitive costs of production given current oil prices, and lack of public support mean that we\u2019re still many years away from filling up our tanks with green gas. But to pretend that it\u2019s an impossibility, or that it\u2019s purely within the realm of science fiction, does a discredit to those scientists, engineers, and investors who are looking to\u00a0make it a reality<\/a>. When the algae fuel marketing campaign heats up in the next decade or so, it will do well to take heed of Coleridge and suspension of disbelief. Make us believe it\u2019s possible, make us believe it\u2019s real, and we\u2019ll have confidence that\u00a0flying an airliner<\/a>\u00a0across the Pacific powered on green slime is not magic, it\u2019s technology.<\/p>\n

(Icon photo courtesy of BioShark Technology, biofuel cycle graphic courtesy of refuellingthefuture.yolasite.com)<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The science fiction genre, in literature and film, has always had a difficult time appealing to a mainstream audience. While much of that is to do with poor writing and a focus on technology rather than art, it is also due to something Samuel Coleridge called\u00a0suspension of disbelief. This is achieved when the writer involves … <\/p>\n