$wpsc_version = 169; {"id":553,"date":"2012-03-23T19:49:52","date_gmt":"2012-03-23T19:49:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/christophergully.com\/?p=553"},"modified":"2013-04-05T19:52:12","modified_gmt":"2013-04-05T19:52:12","slug":"fuel-from-slime-suspension-of-disbelief","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/christophergully.com\/2012\/03\/fuel-from-slime-suspension-of-disbelief\/","title":{"rendered":"Fuel From Slime: Suspension of Disbelief"},"content":{"rendered":"
The science fiction genre, in literature and film, has always had a difficult time appealing to a mainstream audience. While much of that is to do with poor writing and a focus on technology rather than art, it is also due to something Samuel Coleridge called\u00a0suspension of disbelief<\/a>. This is achieved when the writer involves enough of a human element, and enough universal truth, that the fantastical becomes believable. When the artist fails to achieve suspension of disbelief, the audience can\u2019t take the fantasy seriously, and the narrative fails.<\/p>\n Outside of the realm of fiction, alternative energy sources are suffering from a similar challenge. Convincing those who may not have a grasp on the science that we can generate energy from something unexpected requires not only that we present the evidence, but also that we appeal to their imagination. To quote science fiction author and futurist\u00a0Arthur C. Clarke<\/a>:<\/p>\n Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n With this in mind, it comes as no surprise that the American public is generally\u00a0skeptical<\/a>\u00a0of efforts to create fuel out of algae. That thick, slimy, green pond scum that made many of us afraid to dip our toes in the lake, is a potentially game-changing source of energy. Soon after US President Obama promoted algae as an alternative energy source at a speech in Miami last month, the Republic presidential nominees launched a series of retaliatory strikes on \u201cPresident Algae<\/a>\u201d arguing that his claims of algae as a fuel source were, effectively, science fiction.<\/p>\n But if we can ignore the politics of the issue for now, and focus on the science, then it\u2019s clean that this is not as much of a ridiculous idea as some would argue. While the technology remains in its infancy, algae\u00a0has the potential<\/a>\u00a0to produce ten times more energy per hectare than traditional biofuel crops such as corn or soybeans. Further, the land used for algae production can be arid, brackish, or otherwise unfit for agriculture, ensuring that any land lost to algae production doesn\u2019t impact food supply. As with all biofuels, the carbon that\u2019s released when it\u2019s burned is offset by the carbon that it absorbs as it\u2019s grown. Combined with energy-efficient transportation and infrastructure, algae biofuel could make up part of a varied and balanced low-carbon energy system.<\/p>\n